« Antidemocratic and xenophobic forces of Europe have always been attracted by the European unity dream, the mystic of the imperial Rome»
(FB - 1998)
" Being a citizen is a voluntary act "
(FB - 2009)
"Thinking about the future only makes sense if it is aimed at improving one’s thinking about the present and about the trends at work"
(FB - 1998)
"The European project is not a dream, but a hope. It is rooted in rationality, which is not the case with dreams. We Europeans have seen our dreams end in nightmares too often not to be suspicious."
(FB - 2005)
"The strength of a network is judged at the information level of the weakest link, or more precisely the link furthest from the centre of the network."
(FB - 2004)
"Europe's destiny is escaping the two "Greats" and it will come knocking on the door of the Europeans."
(FB - 1989)
"The history of Europe is a bit like a multifaceted diamond. Everyone sees the same diamond... but no one sees exactly the same facets."
(FB - E-storia project, 2004)
"Let us dare the future as the founding fathers of Europe did"
(FB - "From EU to Euroland", 2001)
"The European citizenship can not be decreed. The European citizen can only be born..."
(FB - 1992)
"Every state is a minority in the EU. In any case, let’s not forget that if all our states went into building the EU it is because they all felt too small to face alone both their future and the rest of the world."
(FB - 2003)
"From a single (EU) Currency to a single (EU) Citizenship. The euro is only an instrument."
(FB - 1997)
"An empire is always providing platforms where conflicts and wars prolife­rate... an empire needs enemies, whilst a Community requires partners."
(FB - 1992)
"Europe’s history has taught us that dreams and nightmares are the two faces of the same coin"
(FB - “Europe is Peace” 2006)
"Everybody wants to have a successful enlargement whereas it is a successful enlarged EU which is important."
(FB - 2002)
"It is clear that the existing national political parties can not serve two masters: national and European."
(FB - IDE, 1989)
"It takes teamwork to make Europe move forward."
(FB - 2005)
"There is nothing like one European. The European is a team of Europeans... the only way we can imagine a European, it is a team of people from different countries, not a single man or woman."
(FB - Enschede (NL) 2012)
"On the horizon with a heaven of freedom and a land of responsibility, this is perhaps the soul of Europe."
(FB - 1992)
"The future challenge for the European project is not about Europe anymore, it is about the Europeans."
(FB - 2005)
"The more Brussels speaks English, the less Brussels understands the Europeans"
(FB - 2004)
"Occupy the Future of Europe!"
("What do YOU want as a future for AEGEE?" Franck Biancheri at the 2012 Agora in Enschede)
"To combine new technologies and democratic principles to succeed in the entry of European integration in the 21st century or e-democracy at the service of Euro-democracy"
(FB - EUSV, 2001)
"In the years 00 of the 21st century, democratization can only take place in the perspective of the democratic election of a European executive that remains to be invented."
(FB - EUSV, 2001)
"We must build the European Community, otherwise Europe will soon be culturally Americanised, politically Finlandised and technologically Japanised"
EGEE I, 1984

“We, Europeans, are all Danes!” (2006)


The Mila affair has recently been in the French news and social networks. Should the blasphemy of a 16-year-old girl be condemned? To what extent is it more reprehensible when it affects one or the other of the religions in France? Can this person be threatened with death with impunity? The question is a general one for the whole of Europe “a continent whose freedom was built on the ability of its citizens to conquer the right to mock the powerful, and in particular their Kings or their Gods” Franck Biancheri wrote 4 years ago in 2006. It seems that the Jyllands-Posten (a danish newspaper) Muhammad cartoons controversy in 2005, following which Franck Biancheri wrote (under pseudonym) the article below and a first one “Caricatures de Mahomet : l’Islam en Europe doit apprendre la liberté d’expression” (“Islam in Europe has to learn freedom of expression” published on the French page of this site), notably in response to the pressure that he considered inadmissible from Arab countries on Denmark -pressure that led the European press to take over the cartoons concerned- and the Charlie Hebdo shooting on 7 January 2015 (17 deads) are already beginning to get lost in the meanders of time. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, underlined: “The law is clear: we have the right to blasphemy, to criticise, to caricature religions” (Huffington Post, 12/02/2020). And as Franck Biancheri himself pointed out:


“In Europe, the media are free to express their opinion; if something breaks the law, justice is there to take action…”


Muhammad Caricatures: We, Europeans, are all Danes!

Franck Biancheri (pseudo) 13/02/2006


It is not by chance if within the so-called ‘West’, the US media did not show any significant solidarity with their Danish colleagues[2] … and quite the contrary tried to put themselves ‘off the hook’ of the supposed ‘Muslim rage’.


It is not by chance if both the US State Department and the British Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, condemned the caricatures’ publication by the Danish newspaper, thus making many Danes wonder what exactly is Denmark doing in Iraq within the ‘coalition of the willing’, supporting two governments which obviously do not share their own vision of freedom of expression, human rights and relation between religion and politics.


It is not by chance if those governments, US and UK, which having been bombing and/or torturing Arabs and Muslims every single day for the last 3 years, try to make the Europeans look like the ‘bad guys’ because of ‘cartoons’. These two governments are also enemies of freedom of expression, and they are led by two individuals, Bush and Blair, whose religious bigotry made them closer to Islamic extremists than to European journalists.


It is not by chance also if Muslims within Europe demonstrated only peacefully and on a very small scale against these caricatures. The vast majority of Muslims in Europe feel European and as such feel entitled to express themselves, as any other European, in the framework of the state of law.


On the contrary it is not by chance if the international media – i.e. essentially those belonging to the ‘Anglosphere’ – flooded us with images of violent Muslim protests in dominantly Muslim countries, trying to fool us in believing that the “Muslim world” was enraged.


It is not by chance if the supposed to be ‘anti-European’ backlash, as conveyed on the same kind of media, appeared to be at its peak in countries currently involved in a showdown with the USA: Syria, Iran, Palestine, … because when there is rage and anger expressed today in the Muslim world it is definitely not ‘anti-European’ but absolutely ‘anti-West’ … which today means ‘anti-US’, knowing that the ‘West’ is now a concept that remains valid solely in US or UK leadership rhetoric.


However, if we, Europeans, are all Danes, it is pretty obvious that all our governments are not Danes. The Danish government is right when it criticizes the very weak EU support to its position, which can be summarized in the following way: ‘In Europe, the media are free to express their opinion; if something breaks the law, justice is there to take action’. And it is exactly what those European Muslims who feel offended by the cartoons are doing[3]; and in Denmark for instance the justice court already said, months ago, that the cartoons were absolutely lawful[4].


But what can you expect from European governments which have hardly any support left from their own people, whose elites are more concerned to be popular in Davos than among their own people, who are closer to the company managers taking Danish products away from their shelves than from the journalists trying to express their candid opinions?


So we, Europeans, are all Danes, but not our governments, and definitely not their Iraq invasion coalition’s partners.


Let’s hope now that, with this crisis, the Danes will also come to the conclusion that all Danes are Europeans?


Danes could well start to understand that the 21st century world is not a safe place for lonely and small countries pretending to protect their ‘way of life’ all by themselves, and refusing to embark into the common political endeavours aimed at building the new pillars of tomorrow’s global democracy.


It might be time for many Danes to discover that they share a lot more than they think with the other Europeans, a lot more for sure than with the Americans, and a lot more than their own government with the other EU governments.


Maybe once they have gone through that intellectual process they will become Danish Newropeans[5]? Caring for what the other Europeans think more than for what their own government and other governments may think; caring to join forces aimed at shaping up a European-wide continental democracy; aware that this is the only serious way to oppose those forces which fight freedom of expression and despise the state of law – two pillars of a democracy.


There are constructive ways to resist the attempts made to ‘terrorize’ us. Elaborating a European-wide democracy is one of them. With 500 millions citizens, Europe can build things that cannot be dreamt of by 6 million-inhabitant Denmark!


Franck Biancheri (pseudo Michel van Kriete, 13/02/2006)



[1] Contrary to what was written for instance in an article on EUObserver on February 10th. Entitled ‘European citizens turn against media in cartoon row’, the article in fact explains that it only refers to two polls conducted in France and Norway (so much for Europe) and, in France, conducted by a catholic newspaper (so much for the majority of French people).
[2] The « Philadelphia Inquirer » is one of the very few US media which did so.  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-02-11-philly-protests_x.htm )
[3] And they are only a minority.
[4] As all courts of justice within Europe will most probably conclude, just as they did when Christian or Jewish groups tried similar actions in the past.
[5][5] It is worth reading the very good article of Franck Biancheri , President of Newropeans, published on February 3rd entitled : ‘Mohammad Caricatures: Islam in Europe has to learn freedom of expression’. Though it is still available in French only, it is important to notice that within the French-speaking Internet community (including Arab countries) it has generated an amazing positive reaction, generating hundreds of comments on various news websites.