Extract from chapter 1 “Community or Europe?” in “Europe: Community or Empire?” ©Anticipolis
The European Community is a judicial-political concept. Its origin day is known perfectly well, the day of the signing of the Treaty of Rome on March 25, 1957. Its geographical boundaries are also known by the metre, since its territory covers that of its member states. Its central parameter is hitherto recognisable by the nature of the treaties and rules of law on which it is founded and organised. The Community has nothing in common with Europe, except that it is taking shape in Europe! It is the most recent collective expression in the political field of European “action and reflection”. By analogy, one could say that politico-social engineering is certainly one of the most complex technologies, of which the Community is the ultimate, the state of the art. By virtue of its vocation, it touches such a wide range of domains that it tends to be assimilated to the framework welcoming it. So, there was State and Nation first. Yet the two concepts are different. This seems to be the case today for the Community and Europe. And since there is only one community in Europe, this reinforces confusion even further.
The Community is therefore both an instrument, a technique and a method, whereas Europe is a constantly evolving framework, a past or present reference, never a future one, a multidimensional space unknowable as a whole, as it is always evolving. It is a historical and cultural concept, enabling Europeans to conceive the Community and providing them with the means of implementing it. Like a bridge constructed one arch after the other, we must rely on the preceding one to build the next one. Europe represents this bridge which has been launched through time and which is gradually progressing. Originally, as it was still very small, to differentiate it from other bridges we only had to designate the place of its beginning, namely the European continent. Over time, it has become a large bridge, which has crossed or rubbed alongside so many other bridges, it has abandoned certain directions to take back some other ones. Other bridges have touched the European continent and Europe has touched other continents in its turn. Hence it has become more convenient to define it by all its arches and ramifications (its history), the styles, techniques and methods it used (its culture) in order to be able to distinguish it from the others.
For 35 years Europeans have been building a new arch through an entirely new method, which seems to be more fertile than other preceding ones: The Community method. This method allows to explore new bridge styles, if those using it are imaginative and daring enough. Otherwise, it will only replicate past mistakes, leading to a dead end. That’s where we are right now…
IV – What is the Community?
If Europe is the soul and the historical horizon of Europeans, the Community is the last political invention that allows them to continue building their bridge towards tomorrow, to clear their way to the future. It is the process implemented from 1957 onwards and the form taken by all the States and people applying it. The Community is therefore both a method and the result of the application of this method. This dual nature is the culmination of the present situation: since there is only one Community developed today and since this community is the European Community, everyone confuses the concept of community with that of a European Community. Yet, if the community is indeed a political method or a dynamic political model, the result of applying this method here and now is called the European Community. The Community is therefore a political method, and the European Community is its first historical result… Read more: Europe: Community or Empire? by Franck Biancheri (Editions Anticipolis)
NdlR: In December 1996, the European Monetary Institute is using a graphic project for the verso of the Euro banknotes a bridge which is characteristic for European history.