Home / FB Doc Selection / Divorce: Community vs. Public Opinions: Forgetting any respect for diversity (Europe: Communy or Empire? by Franck Biancheri, 1992)
Divorce: Community vs. Public Opinions: Forgetting any respect for diversity (Europe: Communy or Empire? by Franck Biancheri, 1992)

Divorce: Community vs. Public Opinions: Forgetting any respect for diversity (Europe: Communy or Empire? by Franck Biancheri, 1992)

The current lack of respect for this diversity steadily increases the number of people worried about the Community process, even starting, as evidenced by the difficulties encountered by the ratification of the Maastricht Treaty, in winning numbers of young people and pro-Europeans

Plurality is not the difference, because it is the multiple expression of a common identity, whereas difference is the affirmation of an absence of the latter. This is why diversity is generally embodied in methods rather than in objectives. It represents the other face of the European identity, a complement to unity.

To respect it is to affirm that we are European because we are French, German, Italian … and not European instead of being French, German, Italian … To respect it is to affirm that our European identity is unknowable, a forever foundation of our national identities, which can only take shape through our national, regional and local identities and cultures. To respect it is to assert that Europe is always behind us, never ahead of us. It is the backbone allowing us to move forward, the horizon allowing us to discover and invent. To respect it is to assert that the individual does not exist if he is fragmented within immense communities, that he needs intermediate communities to make him reach the consciousness of belonging to the broadest. And in order to really belong, he must also be able to act and really influence. Without intermediate communities he can do nothing, since he would drown in the masses. To respect it is not only to affirm it, but above all to imagine the operational instruments of its preservation.

It is enough to know what it is. Being the exact counterpart of the concept of European unity, European diversity is the affirmation of the difference in the forms taken by our common identity. If unity is our strength, diversity is our wealth. Thus, by preserving it we, above all, implement the democratic procedures within the Community process and differentiate the objectives from the methods (the substance from the form) in order to enable each community to contribute in its own way to the common work.

Thus, when a real common education policy is implemented tomorrow, there will be no need to impose a framework of application. The objectives in terms of common curricula, student exchanges, integrated curricula, meetings of school children and high school students, etc., are set commonly, whilst the methods of implementation and the responsible bodies must be chosen by each people: if the French remain attached to the concept of National Education, they will entrust all this to their national ministry; if the Germans wish to preserve the regional dimension, they will entrust it to the ministries of the Länder. Of course, from the administrative point of view, one would think that this will be more complex to manage at the Community level. This is false. To think so, is to ignore three points:

  • without respect for diversity, there will simply never be a common education policy;
  • without respect for diversity allowing the populations to choose the appropriate operational level, the administration of the policy will rapidly become inadequate and therefore ineffective;
  • without respect for diversity, allowing the populations to choose the operational method which suits them, the Community process will face increasing opposition.

Thus, a methodology of respect for diversity is established by creating democratic Community procedures from the bottom up; by distinguishing between common objectives and methods of choice; by non-imposing operational levels chosen by the populations concerned. This methodology is similar to the network model.

The current lack of respect for this diversity steadily increases the number of people worried about the Community process, even starting, as evidenced by the difficulties encountered by the ratification of the Maastricht Treaty, in winning numbers of young people and pro-Europeans.

Read more:

Europe: Community or Empire? Elements of reflection and principles of action for future European citizens, by Franck Biancheri, 1992

Order the book here:

» Editions Anticipolis (or here » AAFB BOOKSHOP)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Scroll To Top